Justin Baldoni has shared extra textual content messages he says are from his It Ends With Us co-star Blake Vigorous and her husband, Ryan Reynolds.
The textual content messages had been launched on a web site, titled The Lawsuit Data, created to assist defend himself in opposition to Vigorous’s sexual harassment allegations.
On the brand new web site, printed on Sunday, Baldoni, 41, additionally shared an amended criticism in his case in opposition to Vigorous, Reynolds, Vigorous’s PR agency and the New York Instances, in addition to a 168-page doc entitled “Timeline of related occasions” associated to the case and the manufacturing of the movie.
Baldoni sued his co-star Vigorous, 37, and her husband, Reynolds, 48, for defamation earlier this month. Baldoni’s swimsuit seeks a minimum of US$400 million in damages that embrace misplaced future earnings. That lawsuit got here the identical day that Baldoni sued the New York Instances for libel, alleging the paper labored with Vigorous to smear him.
The timeline contains emails and textual content messages that had been allegedly despatched main as much as and in the course of the filming of the film. Most of the textual content messages have been beforehand shared in courtroom paperwork, however a few of them are new.
“Lemme know what you favor 🙂 should you knew me (in individual) longer you’d have a way of how flirty and yummy the ball busting would play. It’s my love language. Spicy and playfully daring, by no means with tooth,” the textual content continued. “And him serving it again to her is simply as necessary. You don’t often see each the person AND the lady with such company and humor. Anyway, I can act it out for you subsequent week to ensure it comes by means of. Or I can ship now. Lemme know what you favor. Xx.”
Baldoni’s staff additionally uploaded screenshots of textual content messages that they allege are between the Jane The Virgin actor and Reynolds.
The texts are dated February 2023 and present Baldoni introducing himself to Reynolds. The Deadpool star responds with a message about his pleasure for It Ends With Us.
“I’m excited so that you can work collectively,” Reynolds allegedly wrote. “I’m excited for Blake to crack open her artistic piggy financial institution with somebody as dynamic as you. That is gonna be INCREDIBLE… I occur to adore you, Justin.”
Baldoni additionally claims that Vigorous and Reynolds ready a press release for him and his agency, asking him to take the blame for the “troubled manufacturing” of the movie and the detrimental press Vigorous obtained whereas selling it. Baldoni and his staff declare they refused to subject the assertion offered by the couple.
The assertion was allegedly written in August 2024 by Vigorous and Reynolds after they claimed that Baldoni was allowed to debate “extra critical messaging” whereas selling the movie.
The assertion reads, “It Ends with Us was a troubled manufacturing which we take full accountability for. We’re very sorry to everybody we triggered upset to privately and publicly.”
“Blake Vigorous, Katie Scott Colleen Hoover, all the forged and crew led with professionalism each step of the best way, any negativity geared toward them is ours to personal,” the assertion continued. “We mutually agreed that the forged could be selling the movie individually and understood why.
“We’ve all the time mentioned we’re not excellent and even when unintentionally make errors, we’ll all the time personal them. We maintain ourselves accountable, it’s not anybody’s job however ours and that’s a part of being ‘man sufficient.’ We’ll apply what we preach. We’re studying and rising from the expertise and we thank everybody for his or her persistence as we discover a higher technique to proceed.”
After the web site was printed, Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman launched a press release to the press, saying, “The choice to amend our lawsuit was a logical subsequent step because of the overwhelming quantity of recent proof that has come to mild. This contemporary proof corroborates what we knew all alongside, that because of purely egotistical causes Ms. Vigorous and her complete staff colluded for months to destroy reputations by means of a fancy net of lies, false accusations and the manipulation of illicitly obtained communications.”
Get breaking Nationwide information
For information impacting Canada and all over the world, join breaking information alerts delivered on to you after they occur.
“The continuing public curiosity on this case on-line has paradoxically make clear the simple details pertaining to The New York Instances and the way closely Ms. Vigorous and her representatives weren’t solely deeply concerned within the tried take down and smear marketing campaign of Mr. Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios and their groups however that they themselves initiated it,” Freedman added.
Textual content messages between Vigorous and Baldoni, the place she seemingly alludes to Taylor Swift as “one in all her dragons,” had been launched earlier this month. Swift and Vigorous have been very shut pals since 2015 and the pop star is the godmother of Vigorous’s youngsters.
(Swift isn’t named as a defendant in Baldoni’s new swimsuit and her title isn’t talked about within the submitting. There’s solely a reference to “Taylor” in a textual content message between the 2 co-stars.)
Within the textual content messages between the pair, Baldoni goes into element concerning the rooftop scene within the film that Vigorous had allegedly reworked. His attorneys declare that the actor “felt obliged to textual content Vigorous to say that he had appreciated her pages and hadn’t wanted Reynolds and her megacelebrity pal to strain him.”
In line with the swimsuit, Vigorous invited Baldoni to her penthouse in New York, the place Reynolds and a “megacelebrity pal” each praised Vigorous’s model of the rooftop scene.
“Additionally was engaged on rooftop scene right this moment, I actually love what you probably did. It actually does hep rather a lot,” Baldoni wrote within the textual content message. “Makes it a lot extra enjoyable and fascinating. (And I might have felt that method with out Ryan and Taylor). You actually are a expertise throughout the board. Actually excited nd [sic] grateful to do that collectively.”
In a textual content from Vigorous, based on the swimsuit, she calls Reynolds and one other individual, whose title is redacted, “absolute titans as writers and storytellers outdoors of their main gig.”
“Additionally they know I’m not all the time pretty much as good at ensuring I’m seen and utilized for concern of threatening egos, or concern of affecting the convenience of the method. They don’t give a sh*t about that. And due to that, everybody listens to them with immense respect and enthusiasm. So I assume I’ve to cease worrying about folks liking me,” Vigorous allegedly wrote.
Vigorous goes on to check herself to Khaleesi, a Recreation of Thrones character performed by Emilia Clarke.
“Should you ever get round to watching Recreation of Thrones, you’ll recognize that I’m Khaleesi, and like her, I occur to have a couple of dragons. For higher or worse, however often for higher. As a result of my dragons additionally shield these I combat for. So actually all of us profit from these attractive monsters of mine. You’ll too, I can promise you,” Vigorous wrote.
Vigorous and Baldoni’s case headed to courtroom on Feb. 3 because the Gossip Lady actor’s authorized staff started to debate a possible gag order.
On Monday, a U.S. decide admonished attorneys for Baldoni and Vigorous to not publicly talk about the actors’ competing civil lawsuits.
Vigorous’s lawyer Michael Gottlieb complained to U.S. District Choose Lewis Liman at a listening to in Manhattan federal courtroom that Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman violated skilled ethics guidelines for attorneys by accusing Vigorous of “bullying.”
“It’s very arduous to un-ring the bell,” Gottlieb mentioned, arguing that such statements may taint the jury pool for the scheduled March 2026 trial.
Freedman urged that his feedback to Individuals journal and in a podcast look had been a response to the Dec. 21 New York Instances article that “utterly devastated” Baldoni.
“This has not been a one-way avenue,” he mentioned.
Liman adopted a New York state rule barring most out-of-court statements that would have an effect on a case’s final result, with an exception for shielding a shopper from prejudicial adversarial publicity.
The decide may sanction attorneys for violations. Neither Gottlieb nor Freedman objected. Baldoni and Vigorous weren’t in attendance at Monday’s listening to.
Vigorous’s attorneys Gottlieb and Esra Hudson mentioned in a press release, “We’re happy with the results of right this moment’s listening to and keen to maneuver ahead instantly with discovery on this case.”
“The courtroom granted our request that every one attorneys within the matter truly observe the rule of regulation and never make any statements that would prejudice a jury,” they continued. “This case offers with critical allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation. We’ll maintain the defendants accountable, and we’re assured that when all of the proof is submitted on this matter, Ms. Vigorous will prevail.”
In line with The Hollywood Reporter, Freedman mentioned, “I couldn’t be extra happy with how the case was dealt with right this moment. We’re going to maneuver as shortly as potential and show our innocence.”
On Jan. 21, the identical day Baldoni’s authorized staff launched uncooked, unedited footage from the movie following Vigorous’s sexual harassment claims, Vigorous and Reynolds’ attorneys issued a letter to New York federal decide Lewis J. Liman in search of a gag order for Baldoni’s lawyer, Freedman.
In line with paperwork obtained by a number of leisure publications, Vigorous’s authorized staff alleged that “nearly day by day” since she filed her lawsuit in opposition to Baldoni, “Mr. Freedman has given tv interviews, appeared on podcasts, issued inflammatory written statements, and leaked info (together with, remarkably, paperwork as banal as doc preservation calls for to 3rd events) to the Hollywood press and tabloid media.”
The couple’s attorneys additionally alleged that lots of the public statements made by Freedman, “not solely proceed the marketing campaign of retaliation that was the topic of Ms. Vigorous’s First Stop and Desist, however they include quite a few new false statements about Ms. Vigorous and others.”
World Information has not independently seen the authorized paperwork.
In a press release to World Information on Jan. 22, Freedman mentioned his staff launched the footage as a result of “Baldoni workouts his proper to publicly defend himself by placing forth precise details and proof.”
“Previous to submitting her lawsuit in courtroom, Ms. Vigorous went to The New York Instances in an effort to publicly destroy Justin Baldoni. When Mr. Baldoni workouts his proper to publicly defend himself by placing forth precise details and proof, for Ms. Vigorous and staff this immediately turns into morally and ethically flawed,” the assertion learn.
“Ms. Vigorous desires very completely different requirements to use to her however happily, fact and authenticity apply to everybody and might by no means be flawed. Wanting on the video and the proof to return, I can perceive why Ms. Vigorous would now, not need this to play out in public.”
On Jan. 27, Choose Liman set a March 9, 2026 trial date and moved an preliminary convention from mid-February to this week as the general public feud between Vigorous and Baldoni continues to develop. He advised attorneys to be ready to deal with complaints about pretrial publicity and lawyer conduct.
Vigorous and Reynolds haven’t responded publicly to the web site as of this writing.
—With recordsdata from World Information’ Michelle Butterfield, Reuters and The Related Press
